Introduction to biostatistics: Part 3. Statistical approaches to uncertainty: P values and confidence intervals unpacked.

نویسندگان

  • Helen Doll
  • Stuart Carney
چکیده

(the difference in risk) is estimated to be 19.6% with a 95% CI of 5.7% to 33.6%. The P value of 0.006 means that an ARR of 19.6% or more would occur only in 6 in 1000 trials if streptomycin was equally as effective as bed rest. Since the P value is less than 0.05, the results are statistically significant (i.e., it is unlikely that streptomycin is ineffective in preventing death). The 95% CI suggests that the likely true benefit of streptomycin could be as small as 5.7% or as large as 33.6%, but is very unlikely to be 0% or less. Our best estimate for the ARR is 19.6% and hence the NNT is 6 (95% CI 3 to 18). This means that we might have to treat as many as 18 people with streptomycin or as few as 3 to prevent 1 additional person dying of tuberculosis. Figure 1. Clinical significance and statistical significance. Conventionally, a P value < 0.05 is taken to indicate statistical significance. This 5% level is, however, an arbitrary minimum and P values should be much smaller, as in the above study (P = 0.006), before they can be considered to provide strong evidence against the null hypothesis. Hence, reporting the exact P value (e.g., P = 0.027) is more helpful than simply stating that the result is significant at the 5% level (or 1% level, as above). If an effect is statistically significant, does this mean it is clinically significant? A statistically significant difference is not necessarily one that is clinically significant. In the above example, the statistically significant effect (P = 0.006) is also clinically significant as even a modest improvement in survival is important. For many effects, however, the benefit needs to be somewhat greater than zero for it to be of clinical significance (i.e., sufficiently beneficial to be worth the effort of treatment). In Figure 1, while both studies (a) and (c) show a statistically significant result, with the CIs not overlapping the " no difference " value, only (a) has a result that is consistent (in terms of the CI) with at least a minimum clinically important difference. Studies (b) and (d) are not statistically significant, as their CIs overlap the values of no difference. Minimum clinically important difference No difference (a) (b) I n t r o d u c t i o n What is statistical uncertainty? …

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Effective communication of standard errors and confidence intervals.

When reporting estimates and associated standard errors (ses) or confidence intervals (CIs), the standard formats, “estimate (se)” and “estimate (95% CI: [lower, upper]),” can be confusing in text; in tables they hinder comparisons. Furthermore, some readers can misinterpret the CI format as indicating equal support for all reported values. To remedy these deficits, we recommend formats that (1...

متن کامل

What is confidence? Part 1: The use and interpretation of confidence intervals.

Hypothesis testing and the P value it generates are overemphasized in statistical analyses published in medical journals. An alternative, the confidence interval (CI), offers significantly more information to readers interpreting results. There have been many authoritative calls for the report of CIs in place of P values, such as that of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors, w...

متن کامل

Bayes Interval Estimation on the Parameters of the Weibull Distribution for Complete and Censored Tests

A method for constructing confidence intervals on parameters of a continuous probability distribution is developed in this paper. The objective is to present a model for an uncertainty represented by parameters of a probability density function.  As an application, confidence intervals for the two parameters of the Weibull distribution along with their joint confidence interval are derived. The...

متن کامل

Chemistry with confidence: should Clinical Chemistry require confidence intervals for analytical and other data?

Confidence intervals are not commonly provided with analytical or other data reported in Clinical Chemistry although P values are. However, confidence intervals provide an explicit demonstration of the direction and magnitude of uncertainty and are intuitively easy to grasp, unlike P values. It is therefore argued that the Journal should adopt a policy requiring the provision of confidence inte...

متن کامل

Confidence limits, error bars and method comparison in molecular modeling. Part 1: The calculation of confidence intervals

Computational chemistry is a largely empirical field that makes predictions with substantial uncertainty. And yet the use of standard statistical methods to quantify this uncertainty is often absent from published reports. This article covers the basics of confidence interval estimation for molecular modeling using classical statistics. Alternate approaches such as non-parametric statistics and...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • ACP journal club

دوره 144 3  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2006